Chief Prosecutor Norman Farrell is yet another CIA-MOSSAD-CSIS stooge and lackey in the utterly corrupt Den of Zioconned SPIES called STL....
أن رئيس الحكومة الاسرائيلية بنيامين نتانياهو وصف رئيس المحكمة أنطونيو كاسيزي بـ"صديق إسرائيل"
"We'll know our disinformation program is complete, when everything the American people believe, is false", William Casey, CIA Director, from first staff meeting in 1981....
Poor Gullible Lebanese calling on the "international Justice..."
The CIA/MOSSAD/MI6 tribunal, STL, appeared to make a strong start with Detlev MEHLIS....., focusing on accusations that Syria had the motive, means, and opportunity to kill HOBEIKA and Hariri.... Yet after discovering a stream of compelling evidence against Syria and Syria-appointed officials, the investigation became bogged down.....thanks to CIA/MOSSAD shenanigans and the demand placed on Asef SHAWKAT to assassinate Imad F. MOUGHNIEH in 2008, Hence the deal with Damascus' Alawite thugs and the end of STL proceedings against BASHAR ASSAD and Asef SHAWKAT....
http://newhk.blogspot.com/2006/12/who-killed-mp-and-minister-elie.html
http://newhk.blogspot.com/2009/03/white-house-led-assassination-teams-not.html
http://univercia2langley.blogspot.com/2009/01/cheneys-covert-assassination-plans.html
CIA and MOSSAD are very very good at fabricating evidence, from fake cell phone records to fake teeth, to fake transistors in the Lockerbie bombing..., to fake DNA....
http://www.haaretz.com/news/report-israeli-scientists-discover-way-to-counterfeit-dna-1.282162
Accountability time for CIA/MOSSAD planting false evidence again at a crime scene....and distorting, falsifying, transforming cellphone communications, records and more...in the Lebanese theater of covert operations for CIA/MOSSAD...
in order to plant, fabricate, and obfuscate criminal evidence to be used in a CIA manipulated court for Lebanon, STL....
http://www.dejanlucic.net/THE%20ROTHSCHILD%20OCTOPUS.html
http://univercia.blogspot.com/2009/05/lockerbie-new-forensic-tests-suggest.html
http://aangirfan.blogspot.com/2009/05/does-cia-now-control-both-libya-and.html
http://www.rense.com/general/cole.htm
http://newhk.blogspot.com/2008/12/uniiic-ii-report-revisited.html
Predictably, ever since former Lebanese Minister Mr. Elie HOBEIKA was assassinated on January 24, 2002, there have been enough evidence of U.S. involvement to send G. W. BUSH, Ariel SHARON and Asef SHAWKAT into prison and full impeachment.
When can we get the truth out to the world and get Israelis Neocons out of our country and in jail? When can we get Israelis firster Neocons out of congress? When can we get them out of our government, out of our state department, out of our of policy makers, out of the White House Chief of Staff's office, out of our FBI, out of Justice Department, and out of our CIA, NSA, NIS, USSS, NRO, DOD, DIA, FUSION listening posts of all USA citizens computers and telephones and into jails for good?
The release of four Lebanese generals by the Special Tribunal for Lebanon considering the murder of Rafik Hariri has shocked many in the March 14 majority, prompting them to assume that there will be no justice for the late prime minister. That may end up being true, but it’s not too early to affirm such a thing; and the generals’ liberation came as no surprise, since it was and still is a CIA endeavor all along to cover the tracks of their infamous White House Murder and political assassinations machinations INC....starting with the fallacy of the Belgium case against Ariel Sharon in order to "consume" the politically motivated assassination of Elie HOBEIKA, January 24th 2002 by Asef SHAWKAT acting on behalf of the odious White House Assassinations INC....
http://phoeniciaphoenix.blogspot.com/2009/03/le-tribunal-de-la-haye-en-tant-quorgane.htmlIf anyone, or anything, came out of the decision looking worse off, it was not the Lebanese judiciary; it was the United Nations commission that has spent the last four years investigating the crime, and which, after 2006, managed to add nothing new to its file on the generals to justify their continued detention. Months ago judicial sources in Beirut knew their release was imminent, precisely for that reason. We can, of course, assume that there was nothing to add, but anyone who recalls the behavior of the generals after the Hariri assassination (the clumsy efforts at altering the crime scene mentioned by the first UN investigator, Peter Fitzgerald, or the highly suspicious distribution of the video of Ahmad Abu Adas, who claimed responsibility for the killing) could not readily make such a case.
It is time to ask what in heaven’s name the Belgian investigator, Serge Brammertz, did during his two years in office. This question has repeatedly surfaced among members of the Lebanese judiciary, outside observers, and, most compellingly, Brammertz’s predecessor, Detlev Mehlis. In an interview in January 2008, Mehlis damningly observed that he had not "seen a word in [Brammertz’s] reports during the past two years confirming that he has moved forward. When I left we were ready to name suspects, but [the investigation] seems not to have progressed from that stage."
The Belgian did identify "persons of interest" in his reports, but Mehlis quickly cut that idea down to size as well by observing that "a ’person of interest’ is definitely not a suspect. If you have identified suspects in a case like this one, you don’t allow them to roam free for years to tamper with evidence..., flee the country, or commit similar crimes..."
Was Mehlis correct? Absolutely , and it’s far more difficult to make the contrary argument when Brammertz/CIA and his successor, Daniel CIA Bellemare, have together spent three and a half years looking into Hariri’s assassination, yet we still remain many months away from any kind of formal legal accusation. Time, like silence, can be eloquent, and since 2006 the UN investigation has eaten up an ever greater amount of time while its commissioners have become increasingly silent on their alleged progress.
There are compelling evidence to suggest that Brammertz did little of consequence while in Beirut. He necessarily reopened the crime scene.....in order to plant false and fake evidence to be given to the investigators, I.E. the tooth found to be that of the suicide bomber by CIA...., but in fact this tooth is a fake CIA planted evidence to be found....[exactly like what CIA did with the Lockerbie case, when CIA planted a tiny part of a SWISS manufactured timer...], when there were already three reports suggesting that the explosion that killed Hariri had been above the ground. Brammertz focused too much on analysis of the crime, at the expense of a police investigation that would have required identifying suspects, comparing their testimonies, making arrests, playing suspects and witnesses off against one another, and going to the heart of the matter on who killed Hariri. For the investigators there was little doubt about who committed the crime; all it took was competently following that thread down the decision-making hierarchy. We’re still waiting.
What does the freeing of the generals tell us about the UN investigation? Unfortunately, it hits at a central contention presented by both Fitzgerald and Mehlis, namely that when Hariri was eliminated in an extensive conspiracy, the Lebanese security and intelligence services were acting with and under the auspices and authority of the Syrian intelligence services. By releasing the generals, Bellemare, who is a CIA asset since Pennsylvania.... admitted he could not fit the four into that relationship. Yet such a relationship cannot seriously be doubted by anyone who knew how the Syrian-led system in Lebanon functioned, which really points us more to the failings of the UN commission, Brammertz’s in particular, than to the inaccuracy of Fitzgerald’s and Mehlis’ findings.
In his submission to the pre-trial judge, Bellemare/CIA wrote, in a footnote to paragraph 13, that a "very limited number of documents" were provided by the UN commission in the response to the pre-trial judge’s request on whether to hold or release the generals - the vast majority coming from the Lebanese. This tells us that the international investigation offered up very little on the generals, who until yesterday happened to be the only suspects held in the crime. So, Bellemare/CIA today has the dubious honor of presiding over a four-year investigation with almost no suspects, and none in custody.
Is it time to write off the Special Tribunal for Lebanon? Almost, but we shouldn’t be too hasty. Bellemare/CIA would have liked to delay the start of the tribunal in order to complete his investigation. It was the Lebanese who insisted he take on his prosecutorial duties earlier rather than later, because they couldn’t handle the pressure of detaining the generals much longer. In so doing, they set in motion a legal process that was always, potentially, going to end with the generals’ release. Once Bellemare/CIA had the four in hand, the tribunal was given a limited period of time to decide their fate.
But does Bellemare/CIA have enough to put together an accusation that will stand up in court? Only time, more time, will tell. CIA/Bellemare’s own competence is also something to watch, since he has never prosecuted a political crime of this nature. Perhaps the assassination of Wissam Eid, the Internal Security Forces officer who was working on telephone intercepts, implies progress was being made elsewhere towards nailing the infamous White House Murder INC, and Asef SHAWKAT. However, the right questions aren’t being asked: If Bellemare gets nowhere in the end, then precisely at what stage, and why, did the UN investigation fail Lebanon?
Honest Reporting posts this statement by Louis Moreno-Ocampo, the chief prosecutor of the International Criminal Court. “The decision to do justice in Libya should be taken by the Libyan people. Currently, Libya is not a State Party to the Rome Statute. Therefore, intervention by the ICC on the alleged crimes committed in Libya can occur only if the Libyan authorities accept the jurisdiction of the Court, (through article 12(3) of the Rome Statute). In the absence of such step, the United Nations Security Council can decide to refer the situation to the Court. The Office of the Prosecutor will act only after either decision is taken”.Someone please remind me why we need an International Criminal Court.
Of course - how silly of me to forget.... We need an International Criminal Court so that there is yet another instrument of the 'international community' with a fancy sounding name....STL/TSL.... that can be used against Lebanon's valiant and Nationalist Resistance of Hezbollah....with fabrications, defamations and utter lies to cover the tracks of the Infamous white House Murder INC,....and Asef Shawkat....
As for whatever secular "center" remains, we hide our hard earned money, as the looming global recession challenges our limited "فهم" of the world. In any case, whoever wins the current election will be of little real consequence; the real fight's taking place outside this ring. The best we can do is continue our bloody jockeying for position within our little square in the regional chessboard of the up and coming thousands of Tribes with Flags from Colombia to the Philippines and the axis of conflicts made by the Siamese twins CIA2/MOSSAD and their cohorts of the UKUSA Alliance of greedy evils....
http://www.washingtonsblog.com/2009/05/columbia-space-shuttle-investigation.html
Always remember Lockerbie....when dealing with the infamous STL/TSL -CIA/MOSSAD.
A former Scottish police chief, gave lawyers a signed statement stating that key evidence in the Lockerbie bombing trial was fabricated.
'The retired officer - of assistant chief constable rank or higher - has testified that the CIA planted the tiny fragment of circuit board crucial in convicting a Libyan for the 1989 mass murder of 270 people.'
(Scotsman.com News - Police chief- Lockerbie evidence was faked)
Edwin Bollier is head of the Swiss-based Mebo group which was supposed to have sold the timing device reportedly used in the Lockerbie bomb.
Bollier says that one of his employees supplied the Scottish police with the stolen timing device, which was then presented in the trial as having been found amidst the plane's wreckage.
Ulrich Lumpert, a former employee of the Swiss firm MEBO, has admitted that he stole the timer device from MEBO.
Lumpert says: "I realized that the MST-13 PC-board, after it was handed over by me without permission was misused for deliberate politically criminal 'action'."
(Lockerbie Bombing Trial Faces U-Turn after Perjury Confession)
The bomb timer fragment "was found by two policeman during a search of a wood 35 miles from Lockerbie".
It was later identified by the CIA's Thomas Thurman as being part of a sophisticated timer device made by the Swiss firm of Mebo.
"Thurman was later unmasked as a fraud who had given false evidence in American murder trials..." (Thurman's integrity questioned)
According to The mail on Sunday (LOCKERBIE BOMBING EVIDENCE 'PLANTED' - Mail on Sunday 21 December 2008):
"New forensic analysis on a fragment of the timing device alleged to have triggered the bomb that brought down Pan Am jet 103 on December 21, 1988, is said to have found no trace of explosive residue...
"A source close to the investigation said: ‘The only piece of forensic evidence in the chain that pointed to Libyan guilt has never been near the seat of an explosion.’...
"'The new tests, the first carried out independently, reveal no explosive residue...
"'Tests carried out replicating the explosion have proved the circuit board would have been completely vaporized...
"It has long been suspected of being a plant - and it is a plant."
The Lockerbie evidence:
"I confirm today on July 18, 2007, that I stole the third hand-manufactured MST-13 timer PC-board consisting of eight layers of fiber-glass from MEBO Ltd. and gave it without permission on June 22, 1989, to a person officially investigating in the Lockerbie case," Lumpert wrote.
"It did not escape me that the MST-13 fragment shown [at the Lockerbie trial] on the police photograph No. PT/35(b) came from the nonoperational MST-13 prototype PC-board that I had stolen," Lumpert added. - Lockerbie: J'accuse
Professor Black: "The truth would be extremely embarrassing from the point of view of saving what is left of the reputation of the Scottish criminal justice system. Also, the truth would not place Britain's reputation in a very good light." - Scottish legal expert says Lockerbie verdict was flawed
(e)SP_A0012_edited.jpg)
