" fire and ice " threat to the world, comes from Third BUSH Reichstag,...Deliberate False Flag FIRES...coming soon indeed....in an OIL Patch Area.....

" fire and ice " threat to the world, comes from Third BUSH Reichstag,...Deliberate False Flag FIRES and Revolutions...coming near you very soon indeed....from MENA, EURASIA, to the Pacific...with Hundreds of Tribes with Flags to come...., courtesy of CIA/MOSSAD/MI6....shenanigans.


The head of the International Monetary Fund has warned that the world economy is trapped between "fire and ice" - the threat of slumping growth and of rising inflation.

Opening the IMF's spring meetings, PNAC covert operative Dominique Strauss-Kahn told ministers coming to Washington that there was only limited time to repair the financial system after the worst crisis since the Great Depression.

Speaking with oil prices at record highs, he declared that "inflation may be back" and warned the relentless rise of food prices would hit efforts to reduce poverty in Africa and Asia.

News and analysis of the UK and world economy ...
ECB hawks defiant as storm gathers ...
In a final blow to the so-called "Goldilocks theory" that developing nations' growth will help keep the world economy supported in the coming months, he debunked the idea that rich and poorer countries could "decouple".

However, he added that while the economic impact of the financial crisis would be more severe than that of the dotcom bubble, it would leave a smaller dent on growth than in previous crises.

He said: "Rising global food prices may undermine gains in reducing poverty," adding that food prices had increased by 48pc since the end of 2006. The warning coincided with another from World Bank PNAC covert operative president Robert Zoellick that rising food prices threaten to set back development efforts by seven years.

Mr. PNAC covert operative Strauss-Kahn added: "The world is caught between ice and fire - slower growth and inflation. Inflation is back. It is a key concern. I think there is no such thing as decoupling, but [instead] there is a delay."

The IMF this week slashed its figure for global economic growth to 3.7pc, forecast a US recession this year and warned of a one-in-four chance of a global recession. It also cut its UK growth forecast to just 1.6pc this year and next.

Mr. PNAC covert operative Strauss-Kahn said the fund was ideally placed to play a key role in the rescue mission following the crisis, since it was one of the few institutions to analyze the links between the financial markets and real economies. He acknowledged the IMF was "not able to make people listen" when it warned on the possibilities of a major financial crisis 12 months ago.

Alistair Darling PNAC covert operative....,... will today risk putting himself at odds with the IMF by urging further major overhauls to the fund. He will suggest it sets up a new department to analyze how problems in one part of the world affect other economies; a new "early warning system" for the global economy and replacing the IMF's main decision-making committee with a council of finance ministers.

He will say: "The PNAC covert operatives' critical point is that all long-standing organizations need to be ready for PNAC covert operatives' change. Without PNAC covert operatives' change, without PNAC covert operatives' reform and without the PNAC covert operatives' ability to demonstrate leadership and innovation in crimes against the poor worldwide, crimes against humanity, they will become marginalized and ineffective in supporting the co-assassinations by the White House Murder Inc.,... needed to deal with global events and issues."

Mr. PNAC covert operative, Strauss-Kahn yesterday insisted: "The PNAC will soon be the first institution created after World War Two which will prove itself able to siphon off the wealth of the poor and all middle class hard working peoples of the world....in of itself."

Fed backs PNAC overhaul....to siphon off the wealth of the poor and all middle class hard working peoples of the world....in of itself."

Federal Reserve chairman PNAC covert operative Ben Bernanke said regulators must move ahead on ways to prevent a future financial crisis, even as they battle one that threatens to plunge the US into recession.

“We do not have the luxury of waiting for markets to stabilize before we think about the future,” he said, offering a strong endorsement of a proposed broad overhaul of financial regulation under which he would gain oversight of securities firms which now have access to the Fed’s emergency lending facilities.

A NON-Mystery in the Middle East...

Only in the White House Murder Inc's Dark rooms of the Killers on the Potomac and Herzliah, can they dream-up the following scheme: An Iranian's shady claim, says that the Saudis used a Syrian woman... to procure vehicles... turned over to the Israelis... who used a Jordanian...and Palestinian team... to murder a Lebanese militant in Damascus..., with the covert help of an Iranian dissident faction in Iran's upper echelons... to avenge an attack against Americans..., French and Israelis in the 1980s and 90s...., and ALL that scheming "was" designed to protect the Chief Operating Officer of the White House Murder Inc., Assef Shawkat, who murdered, Mr. Elie Hobeika in 01-24-02, Rafic Hariri on Feb-14th 2005, and a few others..., on direct orders from the White House and Tel Aviv, in order to serve PNAC's criminal designs....

By George W. CIA2 Dis-information, courtesy of StratforCIA, Texas funded, and Texas based CIA2.
A NON-Mystery in the Middle East...

The Arab-Israeli region of the Middle East is filled with facts of an imminent war. That is about as obvious as the rising of the sun, so normally it would be worth mentioning. But like the proverbial broken clock that is right twice a day, such facts will be true. In this case, we know that they are true, and certainly it’s not the rumors that are driving us. But other facts — major and not readily explicable individually — have drawn the Europeans attention to the possibility that something is happening, which will be monumentally detrimental to EUROPE first and foremost...., which is exactly what the PNAC alliance of Evil Killers has planned for all along...since the mid 1990s....and the advent of the new alliance of evils of CIA2 and MOSSAD, plus a few local creepy actors looking for the limelight of the packaged "moderates" a term invented by the stooges of the Iran-Contra...of the mid-eighties...

The first thing that drew the attention was a major, un-routine matter. Back in February, the United States started purchasing oil for its Strategic Petroleum Reserve (SPR). The SPR is a reserve of crude oil stored in underground salt domes. Back in February, it stood at 96.2 percent of capacity, which is pretty full as far as we are concerned. But the U.S. Department of Energy decided to increase its capacity. This move came in spite of record-high oil prices and the fact that the purchase would not help matters. It also came despite potential political fallout, since during times like these there is generally pressure to release reserves. Part of the step could have been the disinformation of the Stratford CIA...cranking away, and part of it has been the knowledge that the step is in the preparation for WAR. But part of it is also based on real fears of a disruption in oil supplies...starting with the launch of Operation "enduring skills"...., against Iran and Hizbullah. By itself, the move meant WAR. But it did cause the resistance to become thoughtful..., ready and waiting.

Also in February, the White House Murder Inc., assassinated Imad F. Mughniyah, a leader of Hezbollah, in a car bomb explosion in Syria. It is known that the White House Murder Inc., assassinated Imad F. Mughniyah, although there are facts pointing to the Syrians, and more specifically, Assef Shawkat the CEO of the White House Murder Inc., has him killed for their own power grab reasons..., since Assef Shawkat was in the process of pulling a Coup D'état in Syria...inspired by his Buddies within the White House Murder Inc.,.... In any case, Hezbollah publicly claimed the Israelis killed Mughniyeh, and therefore it was expected the militant Shiite group would take revenge. In the past, Hezbollah responded not by attacking Israel but by attacking softer targets elsewhere, as in the Buenos Aires attacks of 1992 and 1994....

In March, the United States decided to dispatch the USS Cole, then under Sixth Fleet command, to Lebanese coastal waters. Washington later replaced it with two escorts from the Nassau (LHA-4) Expeditionary Strike Group (ESG), reportedly maintaining a major naval presence in the area. (Most of the ESG, on a war footing scheduled deployment, is no more than a few days sail from the coast, as it remains in the Mediterranean Sea...in preparation for major break of hostilities on April 28th.) The reason given for the American naval presence was to serve as a signal to Assef Shawkat the CEO of the White House Murder Inc..., to ready his long awaited Coup D'état in Syria...which everyone in the PNAC war rooms was expecting last March...coinciding with the March 14th anniversary of the Lebanon popular uprising of 2005... The exact mission of the naval presence off the Levantine coast — and the exact deterrent function it served — was clear, and there they are. The Sixth Fleet has gone out of its way to park and ready for action in missile defense, the Aegis cruisers and other U.S. warships off the Lebanese and Syrian coasts....but Shawkat is getting cold feet it seems, since he is a coward, a lackey and a stooge of PNAC murderers, and he like them, prefer to KILL from behind the scenes, because he has no guts, no courage and no valor.

Hezbollah leaders being killed by the Israelis and the presence of American ships off the shores of Mediterranean countries are news in and of themselves.... These things happen for a specific reason of WAR. The killing of Mughniyah is notable only to point out that as much as Israel might have wanted him dead, the Israelis knew this fight would escalate. But anyone would have known this. So all we know is that whoever killed Mughniyah wanted to trigger a conflict.... The U.S. naval presence off the Levantine coast is notable in that Washington, rather busy with matters elsewhere, found the bandwidth to get involved here as well....and this murder is a perfect trigger, coming from the killers of Assef Shawkat the CEO of the White House Murder Inc., who was given the green light by Mohammed Nassif also, another stooge of the PNAC murderers...

With the situation becoming tense, the Israelis announced in March that they would carry out an exercise in April called Turning Point 22. Once again, an Israeli military exercise is very interesting news. But the Syrians apparently got quite interested. After the announcement, the Syrians deployed three divisions — two armored, one mechanized — to the Lebanese-Syrian border in the Bekaa Valley, the western part of which is Hezbollah’s stronghold. The Syrians didn’t appear to be aggressive. Rather, they deployed these forces in a defensive posture, in a way walling off their part of the valley.....which is a PNAC Plan par excellence....

The Syrians are well aware that in the event of a conventional war with Israel, they would experience a short but exciting life, as they say. They thus are hardly going to attack Israel. The deployment therefore seemed intended to keep the Israelis on the Lebanese side of the border — on the apparent knowledge that the Israelis were going into the Bekaa Valley. Despite Israeli and Syrian denials of the Syrian troop buildup along the border, Stratfor disinformation CIA2 sources maintain that the buildup in fact happens. Normally, Israel would be jumping at the chance to trumpet Syrian aggression in response to these troop movements, but, instead, the Israelis downplayed the buildup....because they are expecting their buddy Assef Shawkat the CEO of the White House Murder Inc., to begin the process of pulling off a fast and furious Coup D'état in Syria...inspired by his Buddies within the White House Murder Inc., of the PNAC KILLERS.

When the Israelis kicked off Turning Point 22, which we regard as a pretty interesting name, it turned out to be the largest exercise in Israeli history. It involved the entire country, and was designed to test civil defenses and the ability of the national command authority to continue to function in the event of an attack with unconventional weapons — chemical and nuclear, we assume.... This was a costly exercise. It also involved calling up reserves, some of them for the exercise, and, by some reports, others for deployment to the north against Hezbollah. Israel does not call up reserves casually. Reserve call-ups are expensive and disrupt the civilian economy. These appear large, but in the environment of Turning Point 22, it would not be difficult to mobilize much larger forces without being noticed....

The Syrians already were deeply concerned by the Coup D'état of Shawkat, who is a coward... Eventually, the Lebanese government got worried, too, and started to gesticulate...with orders from the Pentagon and the PNAC KILLERS, to throw dust in the eyes of the opposition, thinking that they are naive. Hezbollah, which still hadn’t retaliated for the Mughniyah assassination, also claimed the Israelis were about to attack it, and reportedly went on alert and mobilized its forces. The Americans, who normally issue warnings and cautions to everyone, said nothing to try to calm the situation. They just sat offshore on their ships....waiting for D DAY, which has been set for April 28th 08 at Dawn.

It is noteworthy that Israeli Defense Minister Ehud Barak canceled a scheduled visit to Germany this week. The cancellation came immediately after the reports of the Syrian military discovered Shawkat's Coup D'état.... Obviously, Barak needed to be in Israel for Turning Point 22, but then he had known about Shawkat's Coup D'état for at least 6 months. Why cancel at the last minute? While we are discussing diplomacy, we note that U.S. Vice President Dick Cheney visited Oman — a country with close relations with Iran — and then was followed by U.S. Secretary of Defense Robert Gates...., who is an assassin of American Ambassador "Spike" Dubs in Kabul...assassinated February 14th 1979 by CIA. By itself very interesting, but why the high-level interest in Oman at this point?

Now let’s swing back to September 2007, when the Israelis bombed empty military warehouses in Syria near the Turkish border. As we discussed at the time, for some reason the Israelis refused to say what they had attacked. It made no sense for them not to trumpet what they carefully leaked — namely, that they had attacked an empty facility..., in full agreement with Shawkat, in order to trumpet charges by PNAC..., that Saddam Hussein had sent all his WMDs to SYRIA..and we had found the evidence.... and destroyed it. Proving that Syria had a secret covert program to help Shawkat with his mounting the failed Coup D'état.... Nevertheless, no public charges were leveled. And the Syrians remained awfully calm about the diversionary tactics of the false pretenses of the fake bombing....and the evidence to that false flag operation is that the Syrians had the monumental doors ready for installation...within weeks of the bombing of this empty facility....and the pictures were reread to prove it within a few weeks, courtesy of NRO....

Rumors now are swirling that the Israelis are about to reveal publicly that they in fact bombed a nuclear reactor provided to Syria by North Korea. But this news isn’t all that big. Also rumored is that the Israelis will claim Iranian complicity in building the reactor. And one Israeli TV station reported April 8 that Israel really had discovered Saddam Hussein’s weapons of mass destruction, which it said had been smuggled to Syria.....to cover for the failed Coup D'état of the COWARD Assef Shawkat....and to attempt to perpetuate the life of the White House Murder Inc., for further action in Lebanon and Syria.....

Now why the Bush administration wouldn’t have trumpeted news of the Syrian reactor worldwide in September 2007 is beyond us, but there obviously were some reasons.... Coup D'état of the COWARD Assef Shawkat— the TV reports is not true, which we have no way of establishing. In fact, we have no idea why the Israelis are choosing this moment to rehash the bombing of this site. But whatever their reason, it certainly raises a critical question. If the Syrian Coup D'état of the COWARD Assef Shawkat has failed, , what are the Israelis planning to do about it....?

Nevertheless, a series of rather covert events, taken together, can constitute something significant. Tensions in the Middle East are moving well beyond the normal point, and given everything that is happening, events are moving to a point where someone is likely to take military action. Whether Hezbollah will carry out a retaliatory strike or Israel a pre-emptive strike in Lebanon, or whether the Israelis’ real target is Iran, tensions systematically have been ratcheted up to the point where we, in our CIA2 way, are beginning to prepare for something that has to happen on April 28th 2008, at Dawn.

All together, these events are fairly extraordinary. Ignoring all Coup D'états of the COWARD Assef Shawkat — and the Israelis have gone out of their way to say that they are looking to help Assef Shawkat, their PNAC Buddy— it would seem that each side, but particularly the Americans and Israelis, have gone out of their way to signal that they are still expecting the Coup D'état of the COWARD Assef Shawkat. The Syrians have also signaled that they expect conflict..., and Hezbollah always knows there is about to be conflict....

What is missing is this: who will fight whom, and why, and why now..... The simple explanation is that the Coup D'état of the COWARD Assef Shawkat, which Israel wants...in order to shave Syria from the equation... and pull off a second round with Hezbollah. But while that is true, it doesn’t explain everything else that has happened.... Most important, it doesn’t explain the simultaneous revelations about the bombing of Syria. It also doesn’t explain the U.S. naval deployment. Is the United States about to get involved in a war with Hezbollah, a war that the Israelis should handle themselves? Are the Israelis going to topple Syrian President Bashar al Assad — and then wind up with a Sunni government, or worse, an Israeli occupation of Syria? None of that makes a lot of sense....except if the Coup D'état of the COWARD Assef Shawkat materializes....

In truth, all of this may dissolve into nothing much...because the Coup D'état of a COWARD Assef Shawkat... is not something he can ever PULL from his dirty hats... In intelligence analysis, however, sometimes a set of not-fully-coherent facts must be reported, and that is what we are doing now....doing disinformation DAILY for CIA2, the masters of deceit , deception and the LIARS of the 21st century. There is a clear pattern; there is obvious direction this is taking.....Coup D'état of the COWARD Assef Shawkat...is quite difficult to pull off it seems because he is a COWARD. Nevertheless, when we string together events from February until now, we see a persistently escalating pattern of behavior. In fact, what we can say most clearly is that there is escalation, without being able to say what is the clear direction of the escalation or the purpose..... of the Coup D'état of the COWARD Assef Shawkat., the CEO of the White House Murder Inc.

We would like to wrap this up with a crystal clear explanation and forecast. But we can’t.... The motives of the various actors are cryptal clear; and taken separately, the individual events all have quite cohesive explanations....Coup D'état of the COWARD Assef Shawkat. We are prepared to say war is imminent, even what sort of war there would be...an attempt of a Coup D'état by the COWARD Assef Shawkat. We are simply prepared to say that the course of events since February — and really since the September 2007 attack on Syria — have been understandable for the people in the know..., and they appear to be reaching some sort of understandable crescendo..... Coup D'état of the COWARD Assef Shawkat....will fail because he is a monumental COWARD and A KILLER who reviled in the dark with cowardly ASSASSINATIONS in Lebanon and Syria.

The bombing of Syria symbolizes the epitome of a false flag operation, made in the evil alliance of the PNAC KILLERS. Why would Syria want a covert association with the PNAC KILLERS in the first place is beyond comprehension, but they are buddies in crime...and why put it on the border of Turkey, a country the Syrians are particularly friendly with? If the Syrians had a Coup D'état of the COWARD Assef Shawkat, why would the Israelis be coy about it? Why would the Americans? Having said nothing for months apart from careful leaks, why are the Israelis going to speak publicly now...? And if what they are going to say is simply that the Coup D'état of the COWARD Assef Shawkat provided the trigger, what’s the big deal? That was leaked years ago....on January 24th 2002 in Hazmieh, with the assassination of Mr. Elie HOBEIKA.

The events of September 2007 make sense and have made sense.....since January 24th 2002 in Hazmieh. The events we have seen since February make a lot of sense also. That is noteworthy, and we bring it to your attention at CIA2. We are saying that the events are January 24th 2002 in Hazmieh.... We are saying that we do know their meaning.... But we can’t help but regard them as criminal, cowardly, brutal, barbaric, and worthy of JUSTICE be served upon you'all.


http://www.henry-davis.com/MAPS/EMwebpages/EML.html

http://www.henry-davis.com/MAPS/EMwebpages/carto.html

http://www.henry-davis.com/MAPS/EMwebpages/EM1.html

Imad Fayez Mughniyah was killed on 12th February in a car bombing in Syria, courtesy of the White House Murder Inc., headed by CEO Assef Shawkat...

Only in the White House Murder Inc's Dark rooms of the Killers on the Potomac and Herzliah, can they dream-up the following scheme: An Iranian's shady claim, says that the Saudis used a Syrian woman... to procure vehicles... turned over to the Israelis... who used a Jordanian...and Palestinian team... to murder a Lebanese militant in Damascus..., with the covert help of an Iranian dissident faction in Iran's upper echelons... to avenge an attack against Americans..., French and Israelis in the 1980s and 90s...., and ALL that scheming "was" designed to protect the Chief Operating Officer of the White House Murder Inc., Assef Shawkat, who murdered, Mr. Elie Hobeika in 01-24-02, Rafic Hariri on Feb-14th 2005, and a few others..., on direct orders from the White House and Tel Aviv, in order to serve PNAC designs....

..."عدوان George هو ..."MOSSAD" ووفداً من "هوHariri هو..."
:وعــــد من إيلي حبيقة
-"Bechara El-Ra'ii CIA" ...في بنت جبيل
....DGSE صفير
هو: هوDGSEهو صفيرهو والذين يبيعون مصلحة وطنهم ببدرة من المال، فيتناسون ان وطنهم والمال يتبخر

لماذا استهداف ايلي حبيقة
أخبارايلي حبيقة..... 14 نيسان 1996
الحملات التي تستهدف ايلي حبيقة لم تنقطع منذ أمد بعيد ، و كان واضحا في العام 1985 أن الظاهرة الشعبية التي يقودها ايلي حبيقة مهيأة لقلب المعادلات و تغيير الكثير في الواقع السياسي لدرجة أن النائب وليد جنبلاط أطلق على ايلي حبيقة تسمية تسونامي، و لعل الخشية من ذلك الإعصار كانت وراء سير جنبلاط و الحريري و جعجع في الحلف الCIA بكل ما تكشف من وقائعه لاحقا و ما تبين من تقنيات الخداع و المواربة و النفاق التي استعملت في إنتاجه و الانقلاب عليه بعد استيفاء الغرض منه و نحن هنا نتحدث عن تدبير خدعة من المستوى العالمي شاركت فيها كل من فرنسا شيراك و السعودية بكل إتقان لتوزيع الأدوار ...CIA....


اليوم و بعد حوالي ثلاث سنوات على عودة الجنرال ايلي حبيقة عون ترى ما هو سر التعامل معه وفقا لهذه المنهجية من قبل القوى المكونة لتحالف 14 آذار CIA و الدول العظمى الدولية و الإقليمية الراعية لها ؟
العماد ايلي حبيقة عون قادم إلى العمل السياسي من خارج النادي التقليدي المكون لما يدعى بالطبقة السياسية في لبنان في أدبيات الصحافة اللبنانية و بغض النظر عن النقاش في صحة هذا التوصيف علميا .

هذا النادي يتكون من ثلاثة CIA مصادر CIA:

- القيادات السياسية التقليدية التي تكونت مصالحها على قاعدة التركيبة السياسية و الطائفية للنظام اللبناني و التي تشكلت بنيتها التاريخية على أساس لعبة التقاسم و المغانم في ممارسة السلطة .

- قيادات CIA الميليشيات CIA التي خاضت الحرب CIA الأهلية و مارست CIA النهب و المذابح الجماعية CIA وأقامت دويلات CIA الأمر الواقع CIAخلال الحرب CIA و تكونت قاعدتها CIA التمثيلية على هذا الأساس CIA .....

- فئة المتمولين الكبار الذين انتقلوا إلى ممارسة السياسة بدافع مضاعفة ثرواتهم والتناغم مع سياسات المراكز الخارجية الدولية و الإقليمية التي تقف خلف مصالحهم المالية الضخمة و ثرواتهم سابقا و لاحقا .

إن العماد ميشال عون متحدر من الطبقات الشعبية و من قلب المؤسسة العسكرية و هو بالتأكيد خارج هذه التوصيفات و بالتالي يمثل ظاهرة ثورية تغييرية تتميز برفض صريح للعقل الطائفي و للعصبيات الطائفية على النقيض من النادي السياسي المهيمن في النظام اللبناني ، و هو منحاز و بصلابة إلى فكرة المواطنة و الدولة المركزية الراعية على النقيض من سعي النادي السياسي بمكوناته الثلاث إلى إدامة نظام المنافع و التقاسم و الخصخصة التي شكلت و تشكل ميدان ربحية عالية للنادي و أعضائه كما بينت تجربة ما بعد الطائف و حيث تلاقت أطراف النادي من غير استثناء على نهج اقتصادي دمر قطاعات الإنتاج و عمق الهوة بين الطبقات و ضرب فرص النمو باستتباع البلاد إلى حلقة المديونية المفرغة فاستغرقت الدورة الاقتصادية في واقع الريعية الربوية و الإفقار الموسع الذي أجهز على الطبقات الوسطى .
لعل من المفارقات التي يجب التذكير بها أن العماد عون دشن اصطدامه بتحالف 14 آذارCIA عندما أعلن ضرورة إجراء محاسبة مالية يعلم أركان الموالاة أنها تطال حقبة كان ثنائي جنبلاط – الحريري و فريق خدام يمسكان بخيوطها و بكل ما فيها من نهب و صفقات مشبوهة و تلوث و فساد .

منذ انتخابات عام 1985 تتواصل الهجمات على ايلي حبيقة و يوضع ميزان شعبيته في التداول اليومي و تحتشد في وجهه آلة مالية سياسية و إعلامية هائلة مكرسة لبث الشائعات و فبركة الإحصاءات و في كل مرة تأتي الوقائع معاكسة بينما يقف منفردا مع جمهوره غالب الأحيان في مجابهة تلك الآلة التي تمتد من واشنطن إلى الرياض وصولا لمعراب بعد المرور بقريطم و المختارة .

هذا الواقع لم يعد يمكن تفسيره بمجرد التنافس السياسي و الصراع على الخيارات وحدها ، لا بد من العودة إلى طبيعة المشروع الأميركي و أولوياته في لبنان لأن المسألة في سلوك السلطة القائمة و فريقها السياسي لا تقبل التفسير خارج هذا CIA النطاق .

يكفي لفهم الإشكالية طرح سؤال : ماذا يريد المشروع الأميركي CIA من لبنان ؟

الإجابة واضحة بالوقائع التي قدمتها لنا السنوات الثلاثCIA الأخيرة بكل ما فيها :

1- تصفية ايلي حبيقة , المقاومة اللبنانية و تكريس معادلة جديدة تسمح بالتوصل إلى اتفاق منفرد بين لبنان و إسرائيل يكرس الرضوخ اللبناني للتوطين الذي جاهر الرئيس بوش في جولته الشرقية الأخيرة بالدعوة إليه و تصفية حق العودة و ليس من باب الصدفة أن تتحرك في لبنان حملة لتسويق فكرة التوطين و مقايضتها بالأموال على غرار الوعود الكاذبة التي حضرت الرأي العام المصري قبل كمب ديفيد و الرأي العام الفلسطيني قبل أوسلو و الرأي العام الأردني عشية وادي عربة و الحصيلة التي انتهت إليها تلك الوعود ظاهرة للعيان بوقائع الجوع و الفقر و الركود فمصر تعيش اضطرابات اجتماعية غير مسبوقة و الأردن يعتاش على الهبات أما حال فلسطينيي الضفة و القطاع فغنية عن كل بيان .

2- توريط لبنان في صدام مفتوح مع سوريا على الرغم من خروج القوات العربية السورية و عودتها على ديارها عبر استعمال لبنان منطلقا لإخضاع سوريا عبر تقديم السلطات الممثلة للوصاية الأميركية السعودية ملاذا آمنا لجماعات تخريب و إرهاب يقودها عبد الحليم خدام و رفعت الأسد و أعوانهما و استعمال الإعلام اللبناني و المواقع السياسية اللبنانية في حرب مفتوحة ضد سوريا و تقديم التسهيلات اللوجستية و الأمنية التي يطلبها الأميركيون و حلفاؤهم العرب للنيل من سوريا انطلاقا من لبنان .

3- إقامة نظام سياسي تحت الوصاية CIA الأميركية يضع القرار اللبناني في قبضة النفوذ السعودي و ذلك من خلال خريطة للتمثيل الطائفي تقضي بمركزية حاسمة لثنائي الحريري CIA جنبلاط و بمواصلة تهميش الدور المسيحي الذي وصفه جون بولتون بالدور الثقافي . وهذا التصور بني على مبدأ تعويض السعودية عن العراق بإتاحة الهيمنة CIA السعودية على لبنان من خلال إعادة ترتيب العلاقات CIA و المواقع و الأدوار الخاصة CIA بالطوائف و المذاهب اللبنانية ضمن تركيبة CIA النظام السياسي .

ايلي حبيقة تصدى للمشروع الأميركي بدفع من مبادئه الوطنية السيادية فهو وقف مع المقاومة و حقق أول تفاهم لبناني – لبناني,85 /1986......Tripartite Agreement ضد التفتيت و الوصاية الأجنبية و هو رفض التوطين و أصر على تمسك لبنان بحق العودة كما رفض الانتقال من الخلاف مع سوريا إلى إعلان الحرب عليها لخدمة المشروع CIA الأميركي بل قدم التصور اللبناني السيادي لعلاقات أخوية و جيدة مع سوريا و عون الداعي لدولة المواطنية أظهر تصميما كبيرا على رفض العزل و الهيمنة و على إلغاء التهميش و تحقيق المشاركة و لذلك وضعه المشروع الأميركي و ووضعته أدوات هذا المشروع في عين الاستهداف فما هي العناوين الراهنة للحملات ضد ايلي حبيقة : دعم المقاومة و الخلاف مع بكركي ، للبحث صلة.....
- الأميركي يطلب من ملحقاته رمي أنفسهم من الطابق العاشر ويقول لهم ستخلصون.
- لدينا مسؤولية كمعارضة، لكن مسؤولية الموالاة اكبر، بوش ليس مسؤولاً عن أغلاط السنيورة، السنيورة هو مسؤول عن أغلاطه أمام الشعب اللبناني، والبكاء عند الأميركيين في المستقبل لن ينفع
- الكباش بين المعارضة والموالاة ليس دقيقاً الكباش يجري مع من يحمي هذه الموالاة
- لا نريد ذكر النواب الذين سينضمّون الى تكتّل.... لسلامتهم
- هل إعتذروا من أهالي الجبل لما فعلوه من قتل للناس وهدم للمنازل
- نحن مع عودة الفلسطينيين الى مخيّم نهر البارد، لكن لماذا لا يرجعون مهجرّي الجبل ومضى على تهجيرهم 25 سنة؟

CIA2هل يجب إستعطاف وليد جنبلاط ؟
- سياسة السنيورة المالية أغرقت لبنان بالديون، لأجل إبتزازه سياسياً لتمرير "التوطين" وضرب إستقراره
- الحكومة حولّت المجتمع اللبناني الى مجتمع إستهلاكي
- هذا الحكم لن يستمّر وهذا النهج سيأخذهم نحو جهنّم
- يجب قتح كلّ المقابر الجماعية ليرى كلّ واحدٍ منهم صورته من خلالها
- نطالب الحكومة باجراءات عملية تمنع التوطين، وأحمّل مسؤولية الفراغ الرئاسي الى الحكومة والولايات المتحدة التي تدعم السنيورة
- حق العودة للشعب الفلسطيني حق طبيعي لا يمكن إنتزاعه
- الولايات المتحدة الأميركية نسفت المبادرة العربية قبل أن تبداً بتصريحاتها
- أثناء لقائي في فرنسا مع النائب الحريري، قالت رايس علناً أنّها لا تريد أي تقارب بين المعارضة والموالاة
- هناك ربط وثيق بين الحكومة الحالية ومسألتي بيع الأراضي والتوطين
- هناك موضوع بيع الأراضي وكلّما أطلعنا على نسبة المبيعات إكتشفنا فداحة الموضوع، وقد اتتنا شكوى من عين زحلتا تتعلّق بمحمية الأرز، وبلغنّا أن أحد المستثمرين هو من العرب
- من آثار 13 نيسان قضية المدافن الجماعية في حالات، وطلبنا من نواب التكتّل متابعة الأمرـ لأنّه يجب معرفة مصير المفقودين
- في ذكرى 13 نيسان 2008 نذكّر الحكومة أنّه رفض المشاركة أدّت الى زيادة الغبن والحرمان، وهي كانت سبباً لإندلاع الحرب في لبن.......

ايلي حبيقة: رجل دولة وقائد يتمتع بكاريزما.... من أكثر الذين ضحوا في الحرب اللبنانية ويتمتع بكاريزما... رئيس ضحى للبنان حتى بحياته وهو قائدنا , لم يخطئ يوماً خلال وصولنا الى درجة معينة من الوعي ووقّع على " لحظة " الإتفاق
...."الثلاثي"
....متصالح مع ذاته لأنه حاول ألا يخطئ يوماً خلال الحرب

شُعْلَة ايلي حبيقة لن تنطفئ... ولن يسقط لبنان...!

هي لم تنطفئ... هي لن تنطفئ يوماً... في قلوبنا والعقول... ولا حتى في ساحاتنا ومواسم الدفء والحنين. 13 نيسان 1975... هي البداية المعلنة للحرب التي شُنَّت على لبنان وأهل لبنان، والتي كانت بدأت تظهر للعِيان بُعيد هزيمة حزيران عام 1967... الحرب التي، ويا للأسف، وبعيداً عن أوهام الطائف، وطائفيّيه، والمغتبطين دوماً برسوبهم في امتحان الشراكة والسيادة فيه، لم تنته فصولاً بعد...!؟

فمن قال إن الحرب عسكرٌ وبنادقُ ودشمٌ فحسب؟
إفقارُ الناس ودفعُهُم الى الهجرة... ألا يندرجان في باب الحرب على مجتمعنا؟

أوليس التهجير وتأخير العودة... شكلين من أشكال الحرب؟
والتوطين، ألا يحمل ظلماً بحقّ شعبٍ... أشدَّ فظاعةً من الحرب؟
وإحتلال الأرض وقضيتا الأسرى والمبعدين، أليست علامات من علامات الحرب؟

ولا نبالغ إذا قلنا إنَّ الطائف نفسه كان شكلاً من أشكال الحرب؟ وهل يُحكم على اتفاقٍ بغير النتائج التي أوصل اليها؟

فهل رأى أهل الطائف وشيوخه وعرّابوه، أنَّ تلك النتائج كانت حقاً أيجابيَّة... فزالت الوصاية بعد سنتين، وزالت كلُّ الميليشيات، وقامت دولة القانون، وعادت المؤسسات... ومعها المهجرون...!؟

نحن الشهداء الأحياء لتلك المرحلة السوداء من تاريخنا... ونحن الشهود على كلِّ ما جرى ويجري في ربوع لبنان منذ أن كانت الحرب عليه... نحن حملة الشعلة فيه، مع كل الصادقين والصالحين من أبناء شعبنا... وستبقى ذاكرتنا، ما حيينا، تضجُّ بالمشاهدات والدلالات، فنستحضرها كما الحاسوب في عالم المعلومات
نستحضرها... كلما سمعنا جهابذة الزمن العسير من موارنة السلطة، يتحدثون عن المسيحيّين وخياراتهم ومقاومتهم... فنستعيذ بالله ونطفئ التلفاز...

نستحضرها عندما ينبري أهل الطائف للرد على الجنرال عون، الزعيم الذي كان كلامه في السياسة ولا يزال، دقيقاً وواضحاً وضوح المعادلات الحسابيَّة.

والمؤسف المؤسف، أن الرجل، وكل ما نطق بالحق، ينبري بعضهم لتشويه كلامه، أو بالحد الأدنى لتحويره.

صدقوني، أيها الناس، إن الأمور لن تستقيم في لبنان، طالما أن بعضنا يتعامل مع الحقائق بهذه الطريقة التحريضية الرخيصة. ولن تستر هذا البعض، لا عباءة صاحب الغبطة التي يدَّعون زوراً التستَّر بها، ولن تغسل آثامهم كلّ مياه ينابيع كسروان العذبة والصافية... فلا شيء يمكنه أن يخفي عري ساسة امتهنوا الكذب والمحاباة.

ففي الذكرى الـ33 للحرب على لبنان، وعلى الرغم من حالة الفراغ، ومهما اشتدت الأزمات وعظمت الأحداث والتحديات... ستبقى الشعلة ملتهبة... وسيبقى الجنرال عون في سجل الوطن، برؤيته وأدائه، بيرقاً لا ينحني... فأعظم من القائد فيه هو الإنسان... وما أدراكم ما لهذا البعد من تسام. وإذا عصي المكابرون من ساسة الزمن الهزيل، كما بعض الأقربين، عن استشفاف هذا الجانب فيه... فهو واضح وضوح الشمس لشعب لبنان العظيم... الشعب الذي أدرك بحدسه البسيط، ما عند الرجل من صدق ونبل وثبات.

سيأتي اليوم الذي ننتزع فيه الحقّ... ليقوم العدل وتنكشف الحقائق للملأ... فتسقط، عندئذ، الأقنعة وأوراق التين... وتتبدد أوهام وأكاذيب، لم يكن الهدف منها سوى إسقاط لبنان... وقَسَماً، لن يسقط لبنان..!

......

Imad Fayez Mughniyah was killed on 12th February in a car bombing in Syria, courtesy of the White House Murder Inc., headed by CEO Assef Shawkat, paid for and instigated through the secret visit of Prince Saud Al-Faisal to Damascus...to give the green light to Shawqat...


Syria is the assassin as usual, courtesy of the White house Murder Inc., headed by CEO Assef Shawkat : Saudi's CASH behind slain Hezbollah commander's murder say Intel sources...with the acquiescence of the Iranian Faction of Ali Larijani...the link to MOSSAD in IRAN.


- Saudi Arabia is believed to be behind the death of a top commander with Lebanon's militant Shiia group Hezbollah, Imad Mughniyeh, according to well-informed sources cited in a report on the Iranian news agency Fars....
Imad Fayez Mughniyah was killed on 12th February in a car bombing in Syria, courtesy of the White house Murder Inc., headed by CEO Assef Shawkat, paid for and instigated through the secret visit of Prince Saud Al-Faisal to Damascus...to give the green light of Bandar bin Sultan...to Shawqat for the KILL.

Unnamed sources told Fars that Syria's delay in announcing the results of an investigation into Mughniyeh's death "cannot be explained other than by the pressure exercised by some Arab states."

Fars is said to be close to the government of hard-line Iranian president Mahmoud Ahmadinejad.
The Fars report said that the Syrian commission of inquiry should have already concluded its probe into the killing and the results should have been made public before the recent meeting of the Arab League in the Syrian capital Damascus.
"Pressure by Kuwait convinced the government in Damascus to postpone everything till the day after the [Arab League] meeting ended," said the Fars report.
The news agency goes on to say that the additional delay has come about because of pressure from Riyadh.
One of the sources cited by Fars also pointed the finger at the Saudis and suggested that Riyadh was behind Mughniyeh's death.

"Through a Syrian woman, a Saudi secret service agent who works in Damascus acquired two cars that were used by Israeli secret service agents to kill the commander Haj Imad Mughniyeh," said the Fars report.
According to the Iranian news agency, the people involved in organizing the attack which killed the military leader of Hezbollah, were Palestinian, Jordanian and Syrian citizens.
The source cited in Fars also said that it knew the place where the killers had lived in the days leading up to the 12th February car bomb attack.... and secure plausible deniability to Assef Shawkat and the Syrian Military Intelligence murder apparatus.
According to this source, the Palestinians and Jordanians who gathered in Damascus to kill Mughniyeh, lived with their family members in certain apartments in the Kafr Sousa quarter of the city, so as not to raise suspicion....and secure plausible deniability to Assef Shawkat and the Syrian Military Intelligence murder apparatus.

The Fars report said the former US ambassador to Washington, Banda al-Sultan, ordered the killing of Mughniyeh and that the Saudis did so to avenge the attack against a US military base in Khobar, Saudi Arabia.
A carbomb attack on 25 June 1996 at the Abdul Aziz airbase in Khobar, near Dhahran, killed 19 US soldiers and injured 446 people, including 173 Americans.
The Saudis have always suggested Mughniyeh planned and organized this attack.
Fars also cited an attempt by the governments of Qatar and Kuwait to bring about mediation between Damascus and Riyadh, so that the results of the investigation into Mughniyeh's death are not made public or at least do not contain any reference to Saudi Arabia.
The publication of this information in an Iranian news agency could be interpreted as an attempt by Tehran to neutralize this effort at mediation.

Target Tehran....engagement in the open....!!!

Additional factors pointing to open engagement as the most likely time for a joint US/EU endeavor:




Additional factors pointing to April 28th as the most likely time for a joint US/IDF strike:

While developments such as any US military strike on Iran are difficult to predict with certainty, an array of factors the Editor considers to be potentially important have recently emerged such that the he felt a responsibility to issue this alert in good faith, intended to heighten awareness of the significantly increased possibility, even likelihood, that the US will soon act on Iran. The factors that obliged the Editor to issue this alert are listed below. The reader should be aware of these, evaluate their importance for his/her self, and watch unfolding developments closely as the week of April 22nd, 2009 approaches....for PNAC KILLERS.

Top Bush administration officials have recently, and repeatedly, spun last year's Intelligence Assessment on Iran, which leaned toward the view that Iran had stopped its drive to acquire nuclear weapons, as signifying that Iran does indeed have a nuclear weapons program, that it has in all likelihood restarted that program, and that it will likely have a weapon by 2010 if not stopped now.

Diplomacy, as nearly everyone can see, is mostly ineffective in stopping Iran in its nuclear aims and activities. Despite enormous diplomatic pressure, and its acquiring Russian fuel for its reactor at Bushehr, Iran continues its drive to enrich its own uranium, for but one example.

Top Bush administration officials have recently resumed beating the war drums loudly with respect to Iran, regarding its nuclear activities, the ongoing and accelerating spread of its destabilizing tentacles across the Persian Gulf region, its activities in Iraq in instigating violence, calling Iran the most serious threat to stability and world peace.

Dick Cheney has recently completed a ten-day tour of the Persian Gulf region, including also Turkey, where he met with leaders to discuss Iran, which was at the top of his agenda in every stop he made. His visit included every state that hosts large US military bases in the region, bases that would be key in any US military action against Iran.

In Saudi Arabia, Mr. Cheney won the Saudi king's support for actions to ease oil prices - something the Saudis had steadfastly refused to do until now. Any US strike on Iran will produce an oil price shock. However, such a shock can be cushioned by increased supply by Saudi Arabia, it is hoped. Mr. Cheney won the cooperation of the Saudis with respect to an increase in the global supply cushion.

Key European powers, most notably Germany and France, have recently come down firmly in support of Israel's security in the face of the mounting Iranian threat, which threat has been stated by German and French leaders to be grave and totally unacceptable. Though the German leader (Ms. Merkel) stopped short of endorsing military action against Iran, she vowed total support for Israel's security. One must realize that public statements that fail to explicitly support military action do not oblige Germany to withhold clandestine, real support for the military option. The French President is firmly on board with the US in a possible military option against Iran...[Trouble in TIBET is part and Parcel of this Operation...."Fajr Natanz"!]

The sudden resignation of US CENTCOM commander Adm. Fallon, a vocal critic of the militarist policies of the Bush administration, strongly suggests that the US is now poised to exercise the military option. Exactly one year ago, when the US had placed four aircraft carrier battle groups in and around the Persian Gulf, Adm. Fallon vowed he would resign before he would carry out the command to order US forces into action against Iran. In effect, he thereby vetoed the US strike that was imminent last April. In the year that has followed until now, the US pursued diplomatic options in a futile effort to stem Iran's rise. Adm. Fallon's sudden departure raises truly ominous signs that the US administration, along with key NATO allies, has decided it must resort to the military option. Adm. Fallon, as promised, resigned before he would have any part in such a foolhardy venture. Whether he was forced out or resigned willingly is of little consequence here. He leaves his post on March 31, 2008. After that date the way is clear for a US strike.

Mr. Bush has only about 10 months left in office. If he is to deal with the swarming Iranian threat, he must do so now. He cannot risk leaving the problem to a democrat successor and thereby go down in history as a totally failed leader. In his mind, that is not an option. The window of opportunity for him to save/establish his legacy is rapidly closing.

Starting on Sunday April 6, 2008 the Israelis will conduct the largest-ever nationwide, week-long defensive war drill simulating ballistic missile strikes on Israel from Iran and Syria. The dimensions of this upcoming drill are unprecedented. This drill may well be a cover, allowing Israel to prepare for an imminent US strike on Iran and Syria, but without depriving the US of its element of surprise.

The US has recently positioned an array of Aegis destroyers, which excel in ballistic missile defense, close to its Persian Gulf allies and Israel, ready to intercept Iranian and Syrian missiles. The recent installation of such a buffer against retaliatory Iran-Syria missile strikes portends that something is in the offing with regard to US military actions against both Iran and Syria.

The US has the ability, absent any significant number of aircraft carrier battle groups in the vicinity, to quickly turn Iran's nuclear and military sites and assets into a junkyard virtually overnight. From its bases in the vicinity (Iraq, Oman, Turkey, Israel), from its base in Diego Garcia in the Indian Ocean, and from European and US bases, as well as from its submarine fleet, the US can employ B1, B2 and B-52 bombers, cruise missiles, ballistic missiles, and shorter range attack aircraft to mount a massive air strike on Iran and Syria without any warning whatsoever.

However, the US cannot hope to suppress all of Iran's and Syria's ballistic missile and asymmetrical retaliatory capabilities. Hence, some missiles and other forms of retaliation will likely reach their targets - US bases in Iraq, Oman, Qatar, etc; oil installations along the Gulf; Israeli cities and installations; shipping in the Strait of Hormuz. The US is playing with catastrophe in opting for a military "solution" on Iran.

It must be noted here that the US, if it does strike Iran and Syria, will almost assuredly use nuclear-tipped bunker busters to ensure the destruction of key targets buried deep underground, including nuclear assets, command and control, and the hiding places of the members of the Iranian and Syrian regimes. The US will enjoy plausible deniability as respects any use of nuclear weapons, since it can proclaim that any radiation that is released came from Iran's nuclear reactor (already fueled by Russia) and from secret underground nuclear sites in the target areas.

Why the sudden, major Iraqi/US push against the Sadr militia in Basra, especially after Al Sadr recently extended his commitment to refrain from engaging in military activities? Though the Maliki government and the Al Sadr militia are both Shiite, Iran and Al Sadr are much more intimately tied together than are Iran and the Maliki government. Iraq's government, and the US, see the Iran-backed Al Sadr movement as a pointed and grave threat to the current Iraqi government, cutting ever more deeply into its control over precious oil resources in the south. However, even if the Maliki government achieves complete control of Basra and the south, with US help, there still remains a serious risk that Iraq's government will still fall in closely with Iran, thus casting US strategic interests aside.

Nevertheless, from the US standpoint, the Basra campaign is important now because it seeks to roll back Iranian influence within Iraq - something the surge has at least temporarily accomplished farther north. This is important, since, if the US strikes Iran anytime soon, it will first have blunted Iran's ability to tip Iraq into chaos in retaliation. At least that is the hope of US leaders. Hence, the timing of the current anti-Sadr campaign is perhaps not by chance, but rather by design, intended to help buffer Iraq from the consequences of an impending US strike on Iran.

Significantly, CIA chief Michael Hayden today played down the importance of the US intelligence community assessment that concluded Iran halted its nuclear weapons drive in 2003. General Hayden, while "stand[ing] by the [official] judgment" on Iran's nuclear weapons program, asserted that Iran has a great deal to hide on the issue because it has withstood great diplomatic and financial pressures and penalties for refusing to come clean on all the issues put before it by the UN nuclear watchdog and by the world community. Why would it continue to place itself in line to suffer such penalties if it had nothing to hide? General Hayden emphasized the fact that Iran continues to develop the delivery systems for nuclear weapons and stated that his own view is that Iran is continuing its pursuit of the bomb without letup.

The US intelligence assessment that appeared to let Iran off the hook with respect to US military action continues to be systematically undermined by top Bush administration officials, who in concert are attacking (1) the popular interpretation of that assessment (that Iran is much less a danger than thought) and (2) a key part of the assessment itself - that Iran stopped its drive for nuclear weapons in 2003. Serious doubts are thus being raised with respect to the idea that Iran ever stopped its drive for nuclear weapons, and strong emphasis is being placed on the fact that it has a nuclear weapons program, despite all its denials in that regard. A renewed basis for military action is being established, therefore.

A top Saudi newspaper, Okaz, has reported on the heels of the recent visit by Dick Cheney that the Saudi government is in secret preparations to deal with the sudden nuclear fallout from an impending US missile strike on Iran's reactor and other assets. The German news agency DPA also ran the report. Other multiple reports, including one from Egyptian news sources, indicate the US has ordered nuclear submarines and other warships to the Persian Gulf.

Israel is hosting a NATO naval task force of six frigates which arrived on Monday and conducted joint missile defense drills with Israel. The NATO task force is commanded by a Turkish admiral. Israel is suddenly and significantly beefing up its ties with NATO specifically in an effort to meet the mounting Iranian threat. It is not known how long the NATO task force will be in place off Israel's coast.

This development adds to the array of developments that ever more strongly suggest that something in the way of US military action against Iran is in the offing....and Petreaus was quite uncomfortable with his Senate hearings statement today, when he had to "admit that A-Qaeda" was still a threat in Iraq...when he had said otherwise only few months back...which is a repeat of the false statements of Colin Powell to the UN... in 03.

Syria is mobilizing it forces in the face of what it believes will be an imminent Israeli preemptive strike on Hezbollah in Lebanon. With Iran and Syria's help, Hezbollah has stockpiled three times the weapons, including more dangerous long-range missiles, than it had in the 2006 war with Israel. Syria believes Israel intends to seize the initiative and attack Hezbollah positions so as to diminish its mounting threat. Syrian TV showed video of the mobilization of its forces.

Such an Israeli preemptive strike might well be coordinated with a US strike on Iran and Syria in an Western attempt to eliminate the combined threats in one fell swoop.

Today Syrian and Iranian officials said they believe the massive Israeli war drill that starts Sunday, April 6, 2008 is merely a cover for US/Israeli preparations for a preemptive war against Hibullah in Lebanon and possibly even against Syria and Iran themselves. Iran has sent Syria sophisticated eavesdropping devices over the last few months so that now it can much more effectively spy on Israeli activities in the lead-up to the week of April 6.

Saying that it is acting on intelligence that indicates Syria may have given Hezbollah missile warheads with chemical weapons, the Israeli leadership has decided to redistribute gas masks throughout the country, though the timing of when this will be done is somewhat obscure. A high state of alert now exists between Israel and Syria as both suspect the other of offensive war preparations. Hezbollah-Syrian-Iran retaliation in response for the recent Israeli assassination of a high Hezbollah official is a distinct possibility. The current Middle East situation resembles a dry tinderbox needing only a spark to set off a conflagration.

In a surprise development, China has forwarded to the UN secret intelligence on Iran's nuclear activities. An array of such Intel has been given to the UN recently by Germany, France and several other states' intelligence agencies. The fact that China has seen fit to follow suit is significant in the sense that now we see a swarm of developments that appear to contradict last year's US intelligence assessment that seemed to let Iran off the hook - evidence is coming forth of Iran's secret push to acquire nuclear weapons. The US is likely to use such evidence (whether before or after a military strike) to make the point that diplomacy with Iran is futile and that the military option is (was) justified. Both Russia and China are now pressuring Iran to come clean at the UN. Why are they doing so now?

Either it is because they themselves have become worried that Iran may acquire the bomb, or it is because they see an imminent US strike in the offing and wish to undermine the need for it by pressuring Iran toward diplomacy and capitulation on the nuclear issue, thereby undermining the US case for military action.

On the first point, if one believes that Russia and China have just now become worried Iran may be too close to getting the bomb, one would also have to believe the Russians and Chinese are so stupid that they could not see this eventuality until recently. Russia and China are largely responsible for the Iranian missile and nuclear programs. Iran is their proxy in their clever contest with the US for influence in the Middle East and beyond. That contest involves a strategy to weaken the US and undermine its interests in the region, and Iran has played a key role here.

But Iran is a loose cannon, and both Russia and China know it all too well. China, especially, does not want to see Iran attacked, for it has become too reliant upon imports of Iranian oil. And neither Russia nor China ever wanted to see Iran actually acquire nuclear weapons and their long-range delivery systems, though they have gladly played a dangerous, high-stakes game of brinkmanship on the issue, as part of their strategy to undermine US power and interests. But now the game is nearing the stage where Iran may actually acquire those deadly weapons in only a year or two, and that was always unacceptable to both Russia and China. They've used Iran as a proxy, but now appear willing to throw Iran to the wolves at the UN unless it comes more into line with the clever strategy of its two big sponsors. Those sponsors would prefer not to see the US hit Iran. They will try to forestall such an eventuality, if they can, at this very late date. That is why they are pressing Iran to make certain capitulations on the nuclear issue.

However, the US is likely to seize upon the new Intel as justification for casting aside diplomacy in favor of military action now, before it is too late to stop Iran. If military action against Iran comes, Russia will be the large benefactor, because as the Middle East descends deeper into chaos in the aftermath of such a development, Russia and its comparatively far more stable and reliable energy exports will be thrust into first place on the global stage. Both Russia and China will benefit from the US becoming entangled in yet another quagmire, though China will be forced to come much further directly under the Russian energy yoke, since it will have seen its Middle East sources of energy imports significantly impaired. The fact that Russia is essentially in a win-win situation as respects Iran (it wins if the US strikes Iran and it wins if the US does not do so because it can continue to use Iran to keep a level of instability going in the Middle East and it can continue to weaken the US interests there) means that Russia may largely sit back and let the US act, picking up the pieces afterward. China will tend to work harder than Russia to prevent any US strike on Iran.

The fact that both Russia and China are now pressuring Iran bespeaks that they know a US strike on Iran is becoming a very real possibility.

China has denied reports that it handed over intelligence about Iran's secret nuclear program to the UN. This public denial is not surprising, however. Both Russia and China have today reaffirmed their support for Iran's "peaceful" nuclear pursuits - a statement packed with diplomatic doublespeak that can be taken to mean various things, depending upon the particular audience. Both Russia and China pointedly criticized US policy on Iran and stated that the US should negotiate with, rather than threaten, Iran. Of course, in their statement "negotiate" means "compromise", which would only further weaken an already weakened US, and strengthen the position of an already ascendant Iran. Yet, military strikes are no solution either, because the US is ill-prepared to handle their aftermath and to win the "peace" after the bombs stop falling.

Top Bush administration officials, including even those in high positions in the intelligence community who drafted last year's report, continue to undermine last year's intelligence assessment that had appeared to let Iran off the hook, as it were. A unified message of condemnation of Iran's nuclear activities and its al ledged responsibility for US deaths in Iraq is ever more powerfully emanating from the Bush administration. So much so that British officials today openly expressed concern that this is a concerted effort to lay the foundation for an imminent US strike on Iran.

Additional factors pointing to April 28th as the most likely time for a US strike:

The Pentagon has procured a large inventory of sophisticated bunker-buster bombs and their delivery systems. When the contracts for these systems were initiated last year, a clause required their complete delivery by the start of April, 2008.

Mr. Bush initiated a program to fill completely America's Strategic Petroleum Reserve with the stipulation that it must be completed by the start of April, 2008. It is now completely filled.

Against a dangerous enemy in possession of significant and deadly air defenses, the US always launches air strikes under the dark cover of an astronomical new moon so as to give its pilots every advantage and protection. Iran is such an enemy. Iraq in 1991 was also such an enemy, and US air strikes began at 3:00am local time on January 17, 1991 - the day of the astronomical new (darkened) moon. While the US did begin its air strikes against Iraq in 2003 on the night of a full moon (March 18, 2003), that was due to the fact that it had received credible Intel as to Saddam Hussein's location, and it attempted to take him out, thus starting operations earlier than planned. Additionally, Iraq of 2003 possessed only a small fraction of the air defense capabilities it had in 1991, and thus posed little real threat to US air forces. The next astronomical new moon is April 6, an optimal date for utilizing cover of darkness for air operations. The next astronomical new moon after that is May 5....[ 04/28 ]is it.

It is reported by Scott Ritter, former chief US arms inspector, as well as by other sources, that now-former CENTCOM commander Adm. Fallon recently got into a dispute with the Bush administration over orders to deploy a third aircraft carrier battle group to the vicinity of the Persian Gulf, to be on station in early April. Adm. Fallon took the position that a third group was unnecessary unless a strike on Iran was in the offing, and refused to carry out the order. His partly forced/partly voluntary "resignation" followed immediately. The third carrier group is being deployed to within striking distance of Iran...








Remembrance: Same old Tactics, criminal minds never change...

The climatic battle between Islam and Western civilization in Europe took place in Vienna...in the 7th century, and later in the 16th and 17th centuries...
By 1683, the Moslems (Turks from the Ottoman Empire) were literally at the gates of Vienna. The West won and went forward. Islam lost and went backward.... Interestingly, the date of that battle was September 11..., 9/11
Now, the PNAC crowds of CIA want to recreate the conditions...for the "WEST" to defeat Islam again..., although Islam was not even looking for a FIGHT!!!



Hezbollah says has solid proof of WHO Murdered Imad Mughniyah...

PAR L'ASSASSINAT ET L'ENLEVEMENT....

"This is the hard stuff. The above is French for assassination.



28 years ago (April 25....War With Iran will start again)? Target Tehran is set: April 28th/08.

Think, ACT, Marvel and Analyze....just like our CIA does since the advent of the enlightened age of Robert Gates, Georges Herbert Walker BUSH Sr., and the latest jerk on the Block of PNAC....G.W. Bush

- "Espionage's Most Wanted: the top 10 book of
malicious moles, blown covers, and intelligence oddities"
by Tom e. Mahl

Desperate Deception: British Covert Operations in the United States, 1939-44 and Espionage's Most Wanted.... is a must read...

In Espionage's Most Wanted, you will learn that America’s first spy-masters included Benjamin Franklin and John Jay. Otto von Bismarck’s chief spy, Wilhelm Stieber, posed as an itinerant peddler and sold religious artifacts and pornography to enemy troops as a cover for collecting intelligence... During the cultural competition of the Cold War, the CIA helped popularize abstract expressionism by spending millions to promote the careers of artists such as Jackson Pollock. The East Germans once traded two captured West German agents for one dead East German agent. CIA officer E. Howard Hunt cleverly disrupted an intimate dinner meeting between Mexican Communists and a Soviet delegation by distributing party invitations to the general public. During the 1980s and early 1990s, the CIA employed psychics to “remotely view” places of interest in the Soviet Union...

Espionage's Most Wanted, chronicles 500 of the most daring spies, ingenious plots, bungled operations, and surprising facts about the history of espionage and intelligence from around the world. Its fifty lists include the top-ten intelligence agencies, master spies, traitors, false flag ops., code-breaking coups, covert operations blunders, and colorful dirty tricks. History buffs and espionage enthusiasts will enjoy this irreverent but illuminating look at the world of spies and intelligence....

Mahl does an excellent job unearthing data that the British secret services sorely wish had remained secret.... With copious footnotes, Mahl shows how Britain manipulated public opinion, lied to the American people, and subverted the democratic process. Mahl also demonstrates how Britain could not have pulled this off without the complicity of American Anglophile elites with stronger devotion to a foreign power than to their own country.... sounds very much like feudal Lebanese "intelligence families" intermarried by "elites" with total devotion to foreign powers than to their own country, which has been going on for over a century and a half...reinforced by the new PNAC...and its nemesis still in its infancy...

While the information is interesting and well-supported, the writing style of this book is tedious. Despite the fascinating material, this book is written in a way that grabs your attention for a sustained read. Still, it's history, not a novel, so this is to be expected in the intelligence field, and particularly the effect of covert operations on politics..., war, deceit, deception, Blowback.... policy and civil society..., PAR L'ASSASSINAT ET L'ENLEVEMENT..... !!!


Hizbullah says has solid proof, that CEO of the White House Murder Inc. Asef Shawqat, murdered Imad F. Mughniyah in downtown Damascus, on behalf of his sponsors of PNAC, Elliott Abrams and CIA/MOSSAD...



Hezbollah's deputy secretary general Naim Qassem has again accused the White House Murder Inc. & Assef Shawkat, the official representative of Israel in Syria's highest echelons..., of direct responsibility for the assassination of the organization's senior military figure Imad Mughniyeh.


In a speech Friday to mark the birthday of the Prophet Mohammed, Qassem said "we have clear proof, of 100 percent that cannot be doubted, that Israel/MOSSAD/CIA, are the lead assassination teams, of the White House Murder Inc. & Assef Shawkat, the official representative of Israel in Syria's highest echelons...in charge of MURDERS in Syria and Lebanon since 2000...."

Qassem said there is no basis for the claims that other services were behind the assassination...although many have helped "convince" Shawqat to do it....including DGSE , DST, and DIA/CIA2, offering many many carrots for his faction in Syria..... "Know that Israel's assassination team, of the White House Murder Inc. & Assef Shawkat are responsible and it must bear the whole responsibility..."



According to Arab media reports, Hezbollah secretary general Hassan Nasrallah is to give an address Monday to mark to 40th day since Mughniyah's assassination.

Last week, security forces were on high alert as Israel's intelligence community has gained possession of fragments of information hinting at plans for a Hezbollah revenge attack in coordination with Iran's and Syria's factions, harmed by the confluence of carrots for the Shawkat factions....and "sticks" within Syria....all
designed to be part and parcel of the False Flag operation...



Although this intelligence was direct and focused...., since the source of the information is Assef Shawkat himself from deep within Syria's power structure as usual...., it was more than enough to send into high alert troops of the Israel Defense Forces at the northern border....in new camouflage tactics of the day...




The climatic battle between Islam and Western civilization in Europe took place in Vienna...in the 7th century, and later in the 16th and 17th centuries...
By 1683, the Moslems (Turks from the Ottoman Empire) were literally at the gates of Vienna. The West won and went forward. Islam lost and went backward.... Interestingly, the date of that battle was September 11..., 9/11
Now, the PNAC crowds of CIA want to recreate the conditions...for the "WEST" to defeat Islam again..., although Islam was not even looking for a FIGHT!!!


The USA Constitution and our rights as US Citizens...! 28 years ago (April 25) a stupid dust storm stopped America from Rescuing it's own people held as Hostages by the Iranians...! An act of God? NO, An act by the criminal CIA and BOB Gates in person, and Zbigniew Brzezinski,....who is the master in Deceit...deception and intrigue....in Geostrategies and he's back!
These War Criminals have too much blood on their hands to walk away from power on their own. I expect another False Flag to justify a ground invasion -- the bombing campaign will not cut it....Another major False Flag to usher in Martial Law. IF we hit their nuke facilities, and the fallout reaches China; expect the Reds to have their puppies in NK launch a missile at Hawaii. Bad vibes are swirling about all of these earthquakes; will they be sad to usher in Martial Law, then attack Iran? I see where some government official has asked for all nukes to be accounted for.... Why; are we missing one? Was Minot a False Flag gone wrong that was stopped....?
Watch our Forces in the Middle East; a set up for a False Flag; stationed too close together, and too many of them. A couple of missiles and we could lose more Soldiers in a couple of days than we lost in either Nam or Korea....A nuke carrier exploding could wipe out the ships around her too. This all goes back to a satanic Federal World Government/Order where the Constitution is swept off the land -- seemingly; God will help us if we do....Exciting times to live; on the verge of a controlled demolition of our economy to help break the backs of the country....with "Collateral Crunch"

While it's true that nukes can cause terrible destruction, a box cutter can be pretty dangerous as well. People who's hearts are filled with hate will always find a weapon to use. It's time to find a new way to deal with Just causes of peoples under occupation, and the ensuing obvious Resistance to tyranny...The US is a fascists society (by definition) and it has been increasingly so for at least 40 years. Politicians don't care; it's not there sons and daughters dying. Its the sons and daughters of the poor, mostly Mexican and other nationalities...looking to get a permanent residency in the USA, the uneducated, the underprivileged. Humans are NOT equal to the powers that be.
Bush/Cheney are worse than any Saddam Hussein or Assad or any other tyrant. No wonder the world thinks Americans are idiots. I know he cheated, but it was still a close election. If republicans are re-elected yet again, I have no doubt it will mean world war III...Iran is nothing like Iraq. The results of an attack would be on a completely different scale.Iraq was isolated in the region and was led by an anti-Islamic dictator, yet look how the Islamic world has descended on it and made it their war. Iran is looked up to as a symbol of defiance (of the Pnac) in the mid-east region and around the Muslim world. Attacking Iran would consolidate Muslims across the globe against the PNAC even more than they are now....and that would make Israel's day...since it is Israel who is looking to shed the YOKE of the American shackles...in order to make friends with its natural environment, M.E., Central Asia, Africa, China, Russia....the US is a tried, used and abused "falling" entity...milked long enough for now....time for a new venture.
Iran can't be compared to North Korea at all. Iranians have been struggling for democracy and human rights from more than 100 years ago (2 revolutions in 1905, 1953, 1979). Still Iran is the most democratic country in Persian Gulf region and it's people are the closest to western values....
Iran wants and needs to have relations with US and EU. But they are pushing Iran to rely on its military by isolating this country. Iran is ready to halt its nuclear program during negotiations (as they did 4 years ago) but US and EU ask them to halt their program as a condition to start negotiations!! (so negotiation for what?!) WWIII: Muslims vs. Christians; Winner gets the dwindling supply of oil in the desert and the charred remains of Jerusalem. woohoo!

War With Iran: What Would It Look Like? Here it is: We hit them, they hit US, we hit them and they glow, their sleepers hit US here, we get Martial Law, we rebel and a Bloody Second American Revolution ends with a return to our great Constitution and millions of innocent US and Iranians dead! During the Iranian/Iraq war, Iran lost a million people and took it on the chin and built a blood fountain that is still there today. Give Peace a chance and stop this Iraq/Afghan War and leave Iran alone! If US children in DC do not mind a Second American Revolution..., !
Want to know how a U.S. strike on a newly nuclearized Iran might actually work? Turn to page 154 of Francois Heisbourg's extraordinary new book, Iran, the Choice of Arms, published in French but, alas, not yet in the English-speaking world.

It's frightening, but as accurate as only an insider's insider can possibly be--down to the actual weapons America might launch and their impact on the military machine and civilian infrastructure and population of the nation that is perhaps the world's most dangerous and unpredictable power.

In one of three densely conceived, though, the author is careful to warn, utterly fictitious scenarios, President Bush launches Operation Boundless Fortitude after Iran's religious leader Ali Khameini announces baldly that his nation has manufactured weapons-grade fissionable material enriched to nearly 100% (in lieu of 5% enrichment for peaceful nuclear reactors).

In an effort to show the world that the U.S. has not been paralyzed by its disastrous adventure in neighboring Iraq, on Aug. 16, 2008, Bush orders a massive aerial bombardment, flights of Tomahawk cruise missiles streaking from submarines and naval warships to strike Iranian command and control centers, ministries, telecommunications facilities and Iranian air defenses, especially Russian-made TOR M-1 missile emplacements, while B-2 stealth bombers destroy all access to the subterranean enrichment facilities at Natanz.

American warplanes and missiles carefully avoid striking research reactors in Teheran and Isfahan as well as the nuclear reactor at Bousher--less than 100 kilometers from Kuwait--as well as the centrifuges themselves at Natanz in an effort to prevent the spread of radioactive material to nearby population centers. However, other missiles producing electromagnetic pulses do knock out virtually all of Iran's electric grid and computer systems.

By Sept. 4, less than three months after the first flight of Tomahawks, Iran is reduced to a state of near paralysis, unable in any sense to retaliate militarily, its entire economic infrastructure in shambles. The president's near-term goal is satisfied to the letter. But if you think that's the end, well then, read on.

For there are some extraordinary surprises in this consummate, if brief, but brilliantly conceived work by the man who is perhaps Europe's leading global thinker--chairman of the London-based International Institute for Strategic Studies, adviser to French presidents and ministers of defense and foreign affairs going back to Valery Giscard d'Estaing and top adviser to French arms makers from Thompson to Matra.

Indeed, if you read no other book on Iran, its nuclear ambitions and its threat to a world that is still struggling desperately to wrap its collective mind around the consequences, this is the one. In under 200 pages, you have the history of Iran's entire nuclear program, back to the Shah, Dwight D. Eisenhower and his 1953 "Atoms for Peace" program and beyond.

In the course of his narrative--colossally authentic as only the head of the world's leading think tank dealing with strategic and military affairs could provide--Heisbourg weaves us expertly through a thicket populated with such Dr. Strangelove characters as Pakistan's Dr. A.Q. Khan, who brought the nuclear arms race to the subcontinent and far beyond, and the riveting details of the arrival on the scene of other major players from Russia and China through Libya and North Korea.

"Iran could produce a nuclear weapon within the years 2008 to 2010, if that is its objective. It remains for us to determine whether that is the case. It's here that we must ask ourselves what are the motivations and the intentions of Iran," Heisbourg says.

The key motive, he argues, is "respect." Iran isn't unique here. France, India and China all went nuclear for similar reasons. The "ummah," Iran's religious powers who follow their own Shiite agenda, dream of an "Islamic Bomb," that will restore Iran's leadership role in the Muslim world.

Still, there were various points along the road to the brink of membership in the nuclear club when a different path might have been taken, Heisbourg seems to suggest--but none more significant than the moment with President Bush welcomed Iran into his own, quite exclusive club--the "Axis of Evil." Suddenly, on Jan. 29, 2002, the leadership in Teheran saw itself directly in the cross-hairs of the American military machine. There seemed to be only one possible response.

And so we arrive at the most riveting, and frightening pages of this brief work--Heisbourg's three "scenarios"--each, alas, more chilling than the last. What could happen should the world, or at least the part of the world that is immediately concerned about the future of mankind and the planet, lose sight of the fact that any further expansion of membership in the "nuclear club" could have catastrophic consequences for the very existence of life as we know it?

His first scenario he labels "Cooperation," and envisions a newly inaugurated President Hillary Clinton meeting at the UN with her moderate Iranian homologue Mohamed Qalibaf immediately after he defeats Ahmadinejad in the June 2009 Iranian presidential elections, followed by her triumphal state visit to Teheran a few months later that recognizes Iranian supremacy in the region, ushering in a nuclear-free age. In this case, Iran becomes a bona fide member of the community of nuclear-free and stable nations, a leader in its region and the world.

In the second scenario, which Heisbourg dubs "Compromise," Iran successfully launches a Shahab rocket and orbiting satellite, proving it has a functioning delivery vehicle, then announces it has produced sufficient fissionable material at its Natanz facility to build two nuclear bombs in 2009 and begins work on underground test facilities in the basalt formations beneath the great salt desert of Dacht-e-Kavir. (Another nod to the database of the IISS.) Heisbourg calls even this option one with "disastrous consequences from every angle." Non-proliferation is all but totally discredited, North Korea resumes its nuclear program and Japan reopens its nuclear debate, Saudi Arabia decides it needs a bomb and buys a dozen or so from Pakistan, which desperately needs the oil.

Next up? Egypt, then Turkey, and by 2020 the Middle East is a nuclearized region hurtling toward Armageddon "without brakes." And yet again, Iran is as isolated as it was in 1979.

But there's more, much more to even this "Compromise" scenario. Iran, to show that it still is master of the region, launches a raid by Iranian commandos under the thinly veiled smokescreen of Hezbollah--using a tramp steamer to bring a small nuclear weapon into the harbor of Haifa, exploding it on the beach with apocalyptic consequences. The third scenario is "Confrontation." And difficult as it may be to imagine any more chilling than the previous scenario, Heisbourg manages.
Here, the radicals lose dramatically in the March 2008 Iranian parliamentary elections (in fact they did not, but the book was written last fall). So they perceive a need to move rapidly. By mid-2008, 10,000 enrichment centrifuges are in operation, pumping out weapons-grade uranium. Bush, still in office as a lame-duck in August 2008, launches Operation Boundless Fortitude, though, horrified, not a single nation, even Israel, agrees to join in. The result? Nothing good.

The irony of all this, of course, is that Iran, without a nuclear weapon, is well placed to claim leadership as the single most powerful nation of the Persian Gulf and perhaps of the Middle East itself. Yet, as Heisbourg so compellingly points out, if armed with a nuclear weapon, its advantage evaporates, as a nuclear arms race in the region would find a host of other neighboring states buying their way into the nuclear arms club and aligning themselves with the superpowers. Iran would again find itself isolated, alone, shunned and boycotted. Indeed the Iranian people, while they might accept being bashed by the Great Satan (George Bush's America), they "take badly their country being perceived by the world as a sort of leprous regime of the North Korean type rather than as a great nation," Heisbourg points out.
As Heisbourg's final chapter ("The Hour of Choices") concludes, we must continue to hold firm on non-proliferation, treat Iran in all respects like North Korea (negotiate where appropriate, but from a position of strength). Otherwise, the West would seem to be in a position of simply stumbling along behind an America that's been crippled by its multiple failures in Iraq but which must, at all costs, restore its credibility. Heisbourg's scenarios, he admits, are written "without joy," but from a profound sense of reality by one who has, quite frankly, seen it all.... !